Choosing between Managed SIEM and Co-Managed SIEM is more than a pricing decision — it directly impacts your organization’s visibility, control, and long-term security maturity.
Managed SIEM offers speed and convenience by fully outsourcing monitoring and operations to a third-party provider. Co-Managed SIEM, on the other hand, blends internal ownership with external expertise, allowing organizations to customize detections, develop internal skills, and gradually build a stronger Security Operations Center (SOC).
For organizations looking to mature their security program while maintaining control, Co-Managed SIEM often delivers greater long-term value.
When organizations decide to invest in a SIEM platform, one of the first questions they face is not which technology to choose, but how it should be operated.
Most providers offer two models:
Managed SIEM
Co-Managed SIEM
Both approaches improve visibility and incident response, but they differ significantly in how much control, customization, and internal capability they provide. Understanding these differences is critical to choosing the right model for your organization, today and in the future.
Many organizations seek SIEM services because they face similar operational challenges:
Limited staff managing large environments
Small or overstretched teams spend more time reacting to alerts than improving security posture.
Operational overload
Routine monitoring and maintenance consume engineering hours that could otherwise support innovation.
Lack of centralized visibility
Without consolidated log collection and correlation, teams lack insight into trends, blind spots, and emerging risks.
A Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platform helps centralize logs, correlate activity, and enable proactive threat detection.
Gartner SIEM definition
As its name suggests, managed (also called multi-tenant or SaaS) SIEM is completely handled and operated by a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP). From the two options, managed SIEM is the most convenient service as the information security provider’s team deploys and monitors your SIEM. Therefore, SaaS SIEM eliminates the need to train your own personnel, and onboarding becomes quicker.
When companies choose managed SIEM, the MSSP will most likely offer a Security Operations Center as a Service (SOCaaS) subscription. Along with its SIEM, SOCaaS lets organizations outsource their SOC to MSSPs, too.
You can use managed SIEM, or you can tell the MSSP to service and monitor it on the cloud. If you choose the first option, your IT team has to run and maintain your SIEM. On the other hand, choosing the cloud option eliminates the need for physical infrastructures, such as servers or storage systems.
Firms in less technical industries and companies that have less time to devote to security practices are likely to outsource their SIEM. The businesses with Managed SIEM are often using franchise-type business verticals. In such cases, the organizations have to comply with different requirements at distributed sites, with the technical work being done centrally within the company. The firms often pair SaaS SIEM with other fully managed services like Unified Threat Management (UTM).
Co-managed SIEM is a balance between self-managed and a SIEM operated by an MSSP. With this option, organizations have their own on-premises SIEM while a cybersecurity service provider’s team of experts actively helps in the management and monitoring of the customer's SIEM environment. The service provider’s team collaborates with the company’s internal IT team, providing expert advice and information on major security incidents. Therefore, you have more control over your organization’s cybersecurity while the third-party operator reduces your team’s workload.
Companies like to choose co-managed SIEM when they have a decent in-house IT staff, but they lack the bandwidth to monitor alerts constantly. Such organizations often use the co-managed solution to cut operational costs while they are smaller, but look to move many of the functions in-house as they mature. Co-managed SIEM is also known to be a positive step toward building an SOC within your own IT team.
Before comparing how managed and co-managed SIEM differ, it’s important to understand where they align.
Despite their operational differences, both models deliver core security capabilities that help organizations improve visibility, reduce risk, and support day-to-day security operations.
The following areas highlight what managed and co-managed SIEM have in common.
Both models improve security outcomes, but they serve different organizational goals and maturity levels.
| Capability | What This Means for Your Organization |
|---|---|
| Employee value optimization | Security teams can focus on higher-value work instead of constant alert handling. |
| Focus on operations & business objectives | Reduces day-to-day security noise so teams can support core business goals. |
| Enables innovation | Frees up engineering time to work on strategic improvements. |
| Cost efficiency vs. in-house SOC | More affordable than building and staffing a full internal SOC. |
| Supports SOC development | Helps organizations establish or mature a Security Operations Center. |
| Faster incident response & investigation | Improves detection and response timelines. |
| Proactive risk management | Identifies threats before they become incidents. |
| Advanced threat & intelligence monitoring | Detects sophisticated threats and indicators of compromise. |
| Continuous 24/7 protection | Provides around-the-clock security coverage. |
While these shared capabilities establish a strong security foundation, the real distinction lies in how each model operates, specifically in ownership, customization, knowledge retention, and long-term flexibility.
Understanding these differences is crucial when selecting a SIEM model that not only meets today’s needs but also supports the future maturity of your security program.
Builds your engineers’ skills and expertise. Instead of “eliminating” your IT team, the co-managed service provider’s team works with your engineers to build their skills and expertise. This can come in handy if you have plans to turn to a self-managed SIEM after a time, but your team doesn’t have the necessary skills.
As managed solutions use only basic, out-of-the-box rules, it will be much quicker to build up the SIEM system in a managed environment. But there is a trade-off: whether the time-efficiency of managed SIEM will be worth it for your company to lose the flexibility and the control that co-managed solutions offer. You should always remember that proper security is neither quick nor convenient.
As mentioned before, managed SIEM is more convenient and time-efficient than its co-managed sibling. You don’t have to train your IT team as all your SIEM operations are outsourced to the MSS provider. Also, as this solution takes every SIEM-related task out of your company’s hands, some of your employees can be replaced or re-focused on other operations.
However, managed SIEM often provides you canned “one size fits all” reports that might contain insufficient information for your organization. You need access to new, useful information on your firm’s security, not data that you already know.
As outsourced MSS providers do not work actively with your IT team, they are looking at the network through a keyhole. Therefore, decisions on the severity of network issues are often based on limited knowledge. And this is only one among the many consequences of the managed SIEM operator working for you, but not with you.
Your SIEM tuning stays with the MSSP, which gives you absolutely no information and access to customization perks when you switch providers.
We should admit that RedLegg is biased as we offer our clients co-managed SIEM services. But we truly think co-managed is the better option for many teams looking to build their SOC and looking to continue building their own in-house team.
While we believe co-managed SIEM is better overall, there are some instances when managed would d be a better option for your company. Therefore, you should know the current lifecycle of your business, where it is and where it is heading, and choose the solution you think is the best for your company in its current situation.
Already decided to go with co-managed SIEM? Great. Then you’ll get these unique benefits:
Remember the following when utilizing a co-managed SIEM solution. You control the situation, not the security provider.
Contact us to learn more about RedLegg’s co-managed SIEM services.
Not sure if your current SIEM setup is optimized? Take the first step toward stronger security with our free SIEM Integration Assessment, a no-obligation review by RedLegg experts to identify vulnerabilities and improve performance. Schedule your assessment here.
Managed SIEM is fully outsourced to an MSSP, while co-managed SIEM combines internal control with external expertise for greater flexibility and collaboration.
Co-managed SIEM allows organizations to build internal skills, customize detections, and retain ownership while reducing operational burden.
Yes. Managed SIEM is often effective for organizations with limited technical resources or those seeking minimal internal involvement.
Yes. Co-managed SIEM is commonly used as a strategic step toward developing an internal SOC.
Both models reduce costs compared to building a full in-house team. Co-managed SIEM often delivers greater long-term value through flexibility and skill development.
Want more? Read about...